Arguments for Capital Punishment - 852 Words

Capital punishment is the death penalty .Capital Punishment is the lawful infliction of death as a punishment and since ancient times it has been used for a wide variety of offences. As real justice requires people to suffer for their wrong doing, and to suffer in a way appropriate for the crime. Each criminal should get what their crime deserves and in the ease of a murderer what their crime deserves is death. Capital punishment permanently removes the worst criminals from society and should prove much safer for the rest of us than long term or permanent incarceration. It is self-evident that dead criminals cannot commit any further crimes, either with prison or after escaping or after being released fromit.The crime of rape ,torture ,treason,kidnapping, murder, larceny , and perjury pivot on a moral code that escapes apodictic (indisputably true) proof by expert testimony or otherwise. But communities would plunge into anarchy if they could not act on moral assumptions less certain than that the sun will rise in the east and set in the west . Capital punishment is often justified with the argument that by executing convicted murderers, we will deter would-be murderers from killing people.Deterrence is most effective when the punishment happens soon after crime-to make an analogy, a child learns not to put their finger in the fire ,because the consequence is quick pain. As evidenced by Singapore’s low crime rate ,simply having capital punishment for the criminals. So itShow MoreRelatedThe Capital Punishment Arguments888 Words   |  4 PagesDEATH PENALTY ARGUMENTS Introduction to the Issue Capital punishment is one of the most controversial issues in contemporary American criminal justice administration because it consists of the purposeful taking of the life of another. On one hand, killing for any reason besides the absolute necessity of self-defense violates the moral principles upon which modern society is built. On the other hand, there are criminals whose conduct (including the wanton murder of others) justifies suspensionRead MoreArgument For Capital Punishment889 Words   |  4 Pagesdiscussing whether the death penalty is wrong. I will be arguing in favor of capital punishment and will be presenting several arguments to back up my position. First, an understanding of what the death penalty is and why it is used currently needs to be established. The death penalty has been around almost as long as humans have. It is a form of punishment that is a deterrent for other criminals. Also, capital punishment is a way to prevent the criminal being put to death from c ommitting any furtherRead MoreThe Argument Of Capital Punishment1922 Words   |  8 PagesThe Argument of Capital Punishment There not many issues in the criminal justice system that have caused more heated discussions and arguments as consistent and strong as that of the argument of capital punishment. Capital punishment (death penalty) is one of the most critical issue that has strong defenders and opponents. This kind of punishment is the most severe form in the U.S. todays and it has different type which lethal injectionRead MoreThe Arguments Surrounding Capital Punishment907 Words   |  4 PagesTheory of Retribution The arguments surrounding capital punishment have focused primarily on its ability to provide general deterrence. Instead of focusing on a purely utilitarian aspect of capital punishment, it may be useful to analyze the death penalty through a morality perspective. The idea of retribution often carries a negative connotation because of its equivocation with the concept of revenge. While they may externally seem similar, they are far from analogous when analyzing the underlyingRead MoreArgument for Capital Punishment Essay935 Words   |  4 PagesArgument for Capital Punishment If it were up to me, every murderer in this country would be put behind bars on death row and have their life taken from them just as they took the life of another. The guidelines of an eye for an eye go back thousands of years. Many countries still hold true to these guidelines. Although America doesnt follow the same as these countries, I believe when it comes to murder, they should. Putting people to death for committing murder makes other potentialRead MoreTruman Capote Arguments On Capital Punishment811 Words   |  4 PagesTruman Capote’s Argument on Capital Punishment In Truman Capote’s Novel, In Cold Blood, Capote synthesises the writing techniques of a reporter and an author to tell the horrific and true story of the Clutter family murders. Capote uses comparison, selection of detail, and understatement to pose his argument that capital punishment is not a correct practice. Upon murdering the Clutter family, Perry Smith and Richard â€Å"Dick† Hickock are housed in a jail as they await their trial, which would bestowRead MoreRogerian Argument: Capital Punishment Essay641 Words   |  3 Pageshave been passionately debating the subject of the capital punishment, which has only served to create more divisions within our society. It is an extremely sensitive subject, and one that inspires strong emotions in both directions. Like abortion, gun laws, and the war on terrorism, capital punishment is an issue on which everyone is never likely to agree. If we examine some arguments presented from both sides, opponents of the capital punishment claim that executing someone is nothing more thanRead MoreArgument Against Capital Punishment Essay1096 Words   |  5 Pageshappiness—that is unless youre on death row. In modern day America we are still faced with the antiquated ritual of capital punishment, a practice that interferes directly with the law of the land. The same forms of punishment used during the middle ages are still in effect today, the same ideas that should have been abolished had the U.S. government revised its penology. Capital punishment is cruel as well as unusual and inadequate for our advanced society. The United States is known world wide as aRead More Argument for The Abolishment of Capital Punishment GCSE1179 Words   |  5 Pageslife be worth more than another?s? Would you like to have your dignity, and even your basic human rights to stripped away from you at the flick of a switch or the pull of a tri gger? What is the point in Capital punishment when it doesnt even deter crime? A study into the effect of Capital Punishment said, the presence of the death penalty in law and practice has no discernible effect as a deterrent to murder. How does this serve as a deterrent to crime? It offers the convict an easy way out withRead MoreComparing Two Arguments on Capital Punishment Essay890 Words   |  4 PagesComparing Two Arguments on Capital Punishment In these two short essays, one by Anthony G. Amsterdam and another by Ernest Van Den Haag both authors make two very important views. Although one supports capital punishment and one is against capital punishment, both authors have good reasons to support their case. Amsterdam believes that capital punishment is a brutal process that a murderer has to go through. Amsterdam believes that the murderer should be punished for their actions, but

Organizational Communication free essay sample

I would like to consider organizational communication and its components. As a matter of fact, organizational communication is a set of communications, built on the basis of communication, mediated by information about the organization, its goals and objectives. In turn, interpersonal communication is a verbal communication between people in one of the listed species. Interpersonal communication covers communication within the organization between  different levels and departments. Formal communication is communication, defined organizational structure, relationship management levels and functional departments. It is essential to note that the higher the level of management, the higher the probability of mispresentation of information, because each level of management can adjust and  filter original message. It can be said that the nature of interpersonal relations is significantly different from the nature of social relations, as well as their most important specific feature – the emotional basis. Therefore, interpersonal relationships can be considered as a factor in the psychological climate of the organization or a group. We will write a custom essay sample on Organizational Communication or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Emotional basis of interpersonal relationships means that they arise and develop on the basis of certain feelings that are born from people, who are in relation to each other. It should be noted that the communication process is a process of the exchange of information between two or more people. Its main goal is to ensure the transfer of information and understanding,  which is the subject of exchange. If mutual understanding is not achieved,  communication would not take place, which implies that both parties played an  active role in it. The communication process is a set of elements of this interaction. There are four basic elements of the communication process:  sender the person who generates the idea or collects information and  transmits it; message information directly;  channel a means of communication (oral transmission, meetings,  telephone calls, written assignment, memos, reports,  e-mail, computer networks, etc. ; recipient the addressee of the information and  a person, who interprets it, as stated in Fundamentals of Organizational Communication. Moreover, the communication process involves the exchange of information by following stages:  origin of ideas or information selection;  choice of communication channel;  message transmission;  interpretation of the message. Exchange of information begins with the formulation of ideas or the sele ction of information. The sender decides what significant idea or message should be exchanged. Its role is to design and to code the information and subsequent transfer it to other participants of the process. It is important to properly and carefully formulate the idea and make it more concretely, in order to make it interesting and attractive to the recipient. Unfortunately, very often many people break off the exchange of information in this stage, because the sender does not expend sufficient time to consider the idea of the message. Moreover, it is essential to note that informal, friendly or competitor’s relations can both inhibit the performance of the organization’s objectives and contribute to their faster implementation. As a fact, informal communication plays a critical role in crisis and conflict situations, because very often informal channels operate much faster than formal, and almost always the trust of communicants to the informal information is much higher than to the formal source. One of the main problems of communications within the organization is the problem of data quality, as well as its adequacy, timeliness and accuracy. It should be noted that both formal and informal communications are subject to certain general rules:   * Before establishing contact, both sides usually quite accurately define its purpose. Strong communication occurs in the case, when both parties do not try to get full results immediately. Physical and psychological surroundings have great importance to effective communication, as well as the ability to quickly adapt to specific conditions. * Communications are more effective in the case of usage of non-verbal ways of communication (intonation, gestures, posture, etc. ). * Valuable and useful information for the recipient, even in cases of fragmentary contacts, increases the effectiveness of communication. Feedback is essential to the quality and information content of the message as well as to the quality of communication. * Communication within the organization should be based on long-term interests and goals. This enhances the stability and flexibility of daily work. * The practice of active listening, which involves primarily the termination of your own speech, the benevolent attention of the interlocutor, the absence of the dispute and the foreign occupation during the interview has great importance in communications process, as described in Fundamentals of Organi zational Communication. Communication should be clear, precise, giving the necessary information related to professional activities. It should create an atmosphere of trust; improve the socio-psychological climate in the team. Moreover, with the aim to create a positive image in the market the information should be promptly communicated to employees, which, consequently, will provide an opportunity to enhance the overall manageability of the company, increase its operational efficiency, staff motivation and operational activities in the market, as well as improve the socio-psychological climate within the team. Further I would like to consider leadership as one of the key elements of organizational communication. Interpersonal communication within the organization involves the relationships â€Å"manager – employee†, as well as all areas of life of individuals, groups, society and the state itself. In this case, those, who govern and those, who have been governed, are in interaction. That is why it is necessary to consider the nature of leadership, taking into account the interaction between people. Modern management is hard to imagine without individuals, an innovative approach to changing circumstances with the aim to achieve new and promising directions of development, i. e. management is hard to imagine without leaders. In modern management, leadership integrates interpersonal factors to guide them to achieve the goals of an organization. Consequently, management and leadership are not synonymous, but the ability to be a leader is a key condition to become a manager. The leader is a man who can make the employee his like-minded or follower. The formal relations are official and functional. In turn, the informal relations are psychological and emotional. It is widely known that senior management has a special place in the formal relations, while leadership is a phenomenon, generated by the system of informal relations. Moreover, the role and functions of a manager in the organization are pre-defined, and the role of a leader arises spontaneously without its formal definition and description. Also, it can be said that managers are appointed by senior management, receive relevant authority and have the right to apply sanctions, while the leader is pulled out from the number of people around him, with equal status and position. Thus, management is a social phenomenon in its essence, and leadership is a psychological phenomenon. To sum it up I would like to say that organizational communications is a complex of measures, which leads to the communication system being transparent, open and regular. Of course, it is extremely important to separate functions between the subjects of internal communications. For example, work in support of corporate web-sites, a corporate magazine and corporate events can carry PR departments and partly IT departments, work on the adaptation of new employees, maintaining efficiency of corporate culture and internal communication systems as a whole, keeping climate within the team and HR department with the active involvement of top management in this process. I believe that sooner or later every organization has to make a choice: further usage of â€Å"the old-fashioned† bureaucratic, heartless principles of operation or to make a â€Å"human factor† as the main axis of its activity. The second option requires full commitment from the person, the voltage of the intellect, a willingness to take risks, to take unconventional decisions and the ability to respond for the deeds. However, it is worth it – without any doubts the results of such work will surpass expectations.